Tracking Deezer results for campaign reports Templates
Tracking Deezer results for campaign reports
Deezer delivers usable playlist and listener data, but many PR professionals struggle to extract and present it effectively in client reports. Understanding where to source Deezer metrics, how to contextualise stream numbers against Spotify benchmarks, and which listener demographics matter most will help you build credible campaign narratives and justify ongoing investment in the platform.
Deezer Campaign Overview Report Section
Opening section of a monthly or quarterly campaign report, establishing Deezer's role and results within the broader playlist strategy
[ARTIST_NAME] achieved [PLAYLIST_ADDS] editorial playlist placements on Deezer across [PLAYLIST_COUNT] curated lists, including [KEY_PLAYLIST_NAMES]. The track accumulated [TOTAL_STREAMS] streams over the reporting period, with [PEAK_LISTENERS] peak concurrent listeners recorded during the first fortnight of release. Deezer's French and Brazilian audiences represented [PERCENTAGE_FRANCE]% and [PERCENTAGE_BRAZIL]% of streams respectively, reflecting the platform's regional strength. This performance positions the track within the platform's [GENRE] ecosystem and provides secondary playlist momentum alongside primary DSP activity. The editorial placement strategy focused on [PITCH_APPROACH: discovery/editorial/mood-based] positioning, which aligns with the artist's [TARGET_DEMOGRAPHIC] listener base.
Adapt the regional breakdown depending on campaign scope — UK campaigns often see proportionally lower Deezer impact, so contextualise this honestly rather than overstate reach. Use actual playlist names and categories from your pitch success data.
Deezer Playlist Performance Breakdown Table
Detailed metric tracking for client reports where playlist-level transparency is expected, particularly for label or management audiences
Deezer Playlist Performance | Playlist Name | Editorial/Algorithmic | Playlist Size | Streams Attributed | Listener Retention | ---|---|---|---|---|--- [PLAYLIST_1_NAME] | Editorial | [SIZE] | [STREAMS] | [RETENTION_%] | [PLAYLIST_2_NAME] | Algorithmic | [SIZE] | [STREAMS] | [RETENTION_%] | [PLAYLIST_3_NAME] | Editorial | [SIZE] | [STREAMS] | [RETENTION_%] | Key observations: [PLAYLIST_1_NAME] generated the highest per-listener conversion rate at [PERCENTAGE]%. Listener dwell time on [PLAYLIST_2_NAME] suggests [OBSERVATION: strong genre fit/audience overlap/early-drop-off]. The algorithmic playlist [PLAYLIST_3_NAME] demonstrates organic pick-up beyond the initial pitch window, indicating sustained playlist velocity.
Deezer for Creators doesn't always isolate playlist attribution at the same granularity as Spotify. If exact numbers aren't available, work with estimated ranges and note 'approximate attribution' in footnotes. Focus on retention and listener quality over absolute stream counts.
Listener Demographics & Geo Analysis
Justifying Deezer investment to labels or management by demonstrating listener quality and geographic value beyond UK-focused strategy
Geographic and demographic insights reveal strategic value beyond headline stream counts. [PERCENTAGE_UK]% of streams originated in the UK, whilst [PERCENTAGE_FRANCE]% came from France, [PERCENTAGE_BRAZIL]% from Brazil, and [PERCENTAGE_OTHER]% from remaining markets. Age distribution shows [PERCENTAGE_13_24]% listeners aged 13–24 and [PERCENTAGE_25_44]% aged 25–44, indicating [OBSERVATION: youth-skewed/mature audience/balanced demographic]. Gender split was [PERCENTAGE_MALE]% male and [PERCENTAGE_FEMALE]% female. Deezer's French and Brazilian penetration makes the platform particularly valuable for export-focused artists. Cross-referencing these listeners against [ARTIST_NAME]'s existing fan base on Spotify reveals [INSIGHT: new audience discovery/audience overlap/untapped regional market]. The platform's subscription base in these regions ensures listener quality and repeat engagement potential.
Deezer for Creators provides basic demographic breakdowns. If data is limited, be transparent about what Deezer doesn't disclose and supplement with comparative analysis against other platforms. This section justifies the lower UK stream percentage by highlighting international reach value.
Comparative DSP Performance Table
Contextualising Deezer results against Spotify and Apple Music, demonstrating relative platform contribution and justifying multi-platform strategy
DSP Performance Comparison (First 30 Days) | Platform | Editorial Adds | Estimated Streams | Key Playlist | Peak Weekly Listeners | |---|---|---|---|---| | Spotify | [SPOTIFY_ADDS] | [SPOTIFY_STREAMS] | [SPOTIFY_PLAYLIST] | [SPOTIFY_LISTENERS] | | Apple Music | [APPLE_ADDS] | [APPLE_STREAMS] | [APPLE_PLAYLIST] | [APPLE_LISTENERS] | | Deezer | [DEEZER_ADDS] | [DEEZER_STREAMS] | [DEEZER_PLAYLIST] | [DEEZER_LISTENERS] | Deezer represented [PERCENTAGE]% of total DSP streams during the tracking period. Whilst behind Spotify and Apple Music in absolute volume, Deezer's [STRENGTH: audience overlap/geo reach/playlist retention] adds proportional value. The platform's [PLAYLIST_NAME] playlist delivered [STAT] — outperforming comparable Spotify placements in listener retention by [PERCENTAGE]%.
Avoid making Deezer look like a poor second choice. Instead, emphasise niche strengths: French market penetration, mood-based playlist curation, or specific genre fit. Only include this table if Deezer performance justifies the space — if streams are negligible, focus instead on growth trajectory and long-tail potential.
Long-Tail Playlist Momentum Section
Reporting on organic playlist adds and algorithmic discovery beyond the initial pitch window, demonstrating sustained value and playlist ecosystem health
Beyond editorial placements, [ARTIST_NAME]'s track achieved secondary and tertiary playlist adds through Deezer's algorithmic recommendation system. Over the [TIMEFRAME] reporting period, the track appeared in [TOTAL_ADDITIONAL_PLAYLISTS] user-generated and algorithm-driven playlists, contributing [SECONDARY_STREAMS] streams from non-editorial sources. This organic playlist pick-up indicates strong listener signal for future algorithmic boost. Genre-specific playlists such as [PLAYLIST_EXAMPLE_1] and [PLAYLIST_EXAMPLE_2] provided targeted audience access, whilst mood-based playlists like [PLAYLIST_EXAMPLE_3] expanded reach into adjacent listener communities. The sustained algorithmic activity suggests the track will continue generating playlist velocity beyond the initial promotional window, supporting catalogue longevity.
Deezer's algorithmic playlists are less visible in the platform's creator tools compared to Spotify. You may need to monitor the track directly via incognito browsing to track secondary playlist additions. Emphasise the potential for long-tail growth rather than claiming certainty about future performance.
Listener Retention & Follow-Through Analysis
Deeper engagement metric for reports aimed at understanding audience quality rather than vanity metrics; demonstrates listener behaviour and catalogue potential
Listener retention metrics on Deezer signal audience engagement quality beyond surface-level streams. Of the [TOTAL_LISTENERS] unique listeners who encountered the track via playlist placements, [RETENTION_PERCENTAGE]% engaged with additional tracks from [ARTIST_NAME]'s catalogue. Listeners from [PLAYLIST_1_NAME] showed [RETENTION_%_1]% catalogue follow-through, compared to [RETENTION_%_2]% from [PLAYLIST_2_NAME], suggesting varying audience alignment across playlist contexts. The track achieved [SAVES_COUNT] listener saves, representing a [SAVE_RATE_PERCENTAGE]% save rate — a key indicator of listener intent to return. In Deezer's ecosystem, save behaviour often translates to algorithm signal more effectively than on Spotify, positioning the artist favourably for future release recommendations. These retention metrics validate the playlist pitch strategy and suggest strong potential for catalogue uptake on the next release cycle.
Deezer for Creators provides save counts and listener additions. Use these as proxy metrics for engagement if direct retention data isn't available. Always compare retention rates against genre benchmarks if possible — this contextualises whether the numbers are strong or weak.
ROI Justification for Management/Label Approval
When pitching the value of continued Deezer inclusion in future campaign plans or justifying the resource investment required to manage the platform
[ARTIST_NAME]'s Deezer campaign delivered [TOTAL_STREAMS] streams and [PLAYLIST_COUNT] editorial placements over [CAMPAIGN_DURATION]. Relative to campaign investment of [BUDGET/RESOURCE_HOURS], this represents [COST_PER_1000_STREAMS] per 1,000 streams — comparable with or favourable to secondary DSP spending on Spotify. Beyond metrics, Deezer's value lies in [KEY_VALUE: regional market penetration in France/Brazil/EU/algorithmic foundation for future releases/underutilised editorial access]. The platform's smaller editorial team and lower pitch competition mean successful placements require proportionally less promotional spend and relationship investment than Spotify. For subsequent releases, establishing Deezer momentum now builds algorithmic credibility that compounds over time. Including Deezer in campaign strategy adds estimated [PERCENTAGE]% reach to multi-platform totals at [EFFICIENCY: lower cost/similar cost/manageable additional effort].
Tailor the ROI framing to your specific business model — if you're tracking hours, calculate hourly cost versus output; if you're measuring budget spend, compare direct outlay. Be realistic about Deezer's limitations in the UK market whilst emphasising its strengths where they apply to your artist's geography and audience.
Campaign Report Summary & Next Steps
Closing section of a full campaign report, consolidating Deezer findings and recommending strategy adjustments for the next release cycle
Deezer performed as [EXPECTATION: expected/above expectation/below expectation] within the broader campaign ecosystem, contributing [PERCENTAGE]% of total DSP reach. Key successes included [ACHIEVEMENT_1: successful pitch to playlist name/strong audience overlap/geographic expansion], whilst [AREA_FOR_IMPROVEMENT: playlist retention/listener follow-through/pitch timing] presented learning opportunities. For the next release, recommendations include: [RECOMMENDATION_1], [RECOMMENDATION_2], and [RECOMMENDATION_3]. Specifically, [ARTIST_NAME] should prioritise [PRIORITY: French market positioning/mood-based playlist targeting/earlier pitch window] given this release's demonstrated strengths. Allocating [RESOURCE_LEVEL] to Deezer strategy remains justified by [JUSTIFICATION]. Continuing to develop relationships with Deezer editors whilst maintaining realistic expectations about UK market impact will sustain value from this platform as part of broader DSP portfolio.
Write this section honestly — if Deezer underperformed, acknowledge it but reframe learning and next-step strategy. If it succeeded, use it as momentum for justifying continued investment. Always end with actionable next steps rather than generic conclusions.
Frequently asked questions
Where do I access Deezer stream and playlist data for campaign reports?
Deezer for Creators is the primary analytics tool, accessible via your artist or label dashboard. It provides streams, playlist adds, listener geography, and basic demographics — though detail is less granular than Spotify. For deeper tracking, monitor the artist profile directly via incognito browsing to capture secondary and algorithmic playlist adds that may not appear in the dashboard.
How should I contextualise Deezer's lower UK stream numbers in reports without making the platform look irrelevant?
Reframe Deezer's value around geographic diversification (France and Brazil strength), listener quality metrics (save rates, retention), and cost efficiency relative to campaign spend rather than absolute volume. Emphasise that lower UK streams don't reduce platform value if the artist is internationally focused or if the audience quality is demonstrably high — which you can support with retention and demographic data.
What metrics should I prioritise when reporting Deezer results to labels or management?
Focus on editorial playlist placements (harder to achieve, more credible), listener retention and saves (indicating quality), geographic reach (especially if it serves strategic markets), and comparative DSP efficiency (cost or resource input per outcome). Avoid over-emphasising absolute stream counts, which typically favour Spotify, and instead highlight what Deezer does well within its market position.
Should I include Deezer in comparative DSP tables if the numbers are significantly lower than Spotify?
Yes, but only if you can support Deezer's inclusion with contextualising analysis — explain the lower volume whilst highlighting a specific strength (geographic reach, listener retention, playlist ecosystem health). If Deezer truly adds no value, it's more honest to exclude it and focus report space on platforms delivering measurable impact. Forced inclusion looks padded rather than strategic.
How do I track algorithmic and secondary playlist adds on Deezer when the dashboard doesn't always show them?
Deezer for Creators may not display every playlist addition, so manually track the artist profile weekly by searching the artist and saving the track, then reviewing where it appears in recommendations and secondary playlists. Cross-reference these observations with Deezer's mood-based and genre-specific playlist ecosystem to estimate long-tail momentum — transparency about these being estimates strengthens credibility rather than claiming false precision.
Related resources
Run your music PR campaigns in TAP
The professional platform for UK music PR agencies. Contact intelligence, pitch drafting, and campaign tracking — without the spreadsheets.