SubmitHub submission writing Templates

We're submitting [TRACK NAME] — a [SPECIFIC BPM/PRODUCTION STYLE] track that sits between [GENRE A] and [GENRE B]. The track builds from [INTRO ELEMENT] into [MAIN HOOK/SOUND], with [NOTABLE TECHNICAL FEATURE OR PRODUCTION CHOICE]. It's designed for [SPECIFIC PLAYLIST TYPE: peak-time club sets/underground discovery playlists/driving nighttime listening]. The production draws from [SPECIFIC INFLUENCE OR SCENE], but [WHAT MAKES IT DISTINCT]. This fits [CURATOR/PLAYLIST NAME] because [SPECIFIC REASON BASED ON THEIR RECENT PLAYLISTS]. Included: stems available on request, SoundCloud download link, artist bio. We're also releasing [NEXT PROJECT DETAIL] in [TIMEFRAME].

Electronic curators care deeply about technical production detail and BPM accuracy — vagueness damages credibility. Reference specific recent playlist additions if possible. Include production detail that shows you understand the space, not generic EDM language.

[ARTIST NAME] has submitted [TRACK NAME] from [PROJECT NAME]. This is a [TEMPO/MOOD DESCRIPTION] track featuring [PRIMARY INSTRUMENT/VOCAL APPROACH] over [PRODUCTION APPROACH]. The song explores [THEMATIC CONTENT], with [SPECIFIC MUSICAL MOMENT] as its centrepiece. Sonically, we reference [RELEVANT ARTIST/ERA], though [HOW YOU DIVERGE]. This track suits [PLAYLIST/SHOW NAME] because your recent adds include [SPECIFIC SIMILAR ARTIST] — this shares that [SPECIFIC QUALITY]. Recording: [WHERE/WITH WHOM, if notable], Mixed/Mastered: [RELEVANT DETAIL]. We're [ACTIVE LIVE SCHEDULE/UPCOMING RELEASE], making this a good time for editorial coverage. Demo available via link.

Indie curators respond to narrative and cultural positioning. Vague mood descriptions won't land — be specific about what listeners actually hear. If you lack notable credentials, focus on the track's distinct musical moments instead.

[ARTIST/PRODUCER NAME] — [TRACK NAME]. This is a [BARS/FEATURES] track built on a [SAMPLE ORIGIN/PRODUCTION METHOD] sample, flipped by [PRODUCER NAME]. The beat moves at [BPM], with [SONIC SIGNATURE: crisp drums, live instrumentation, vintage sound design]. [ARTIST NAME]'s flow [SPECIFIC CHARACTERISTIC], delivered over [BEAT ATMOSPHERE]. The track resonates with audiences interested in [SPECIFIC SUBGENRE/SCENE]. It fits [PLAYLIST NAME] because you've recently curated [SPECIFIC SIMILAR ARTIST/TRACK] — this shares [WHAT SPECIFICALLY]. Production credits: [SAMPLE ARTIST IF SAMPLED], [MIXER/MASTERING ENGINEER]. We're currently [TOURING/RELEASING/BUILDING MOMENTUM], so timing works well. Link and artwork attached.

Hip-hop curators need clear production lineage — if sampled, source it. BPM matters less than vibe, but be honest about the track's energy and atmosphere. Name-dropping similar artists only works if the curator actually featured them recently; verify before submitting.

[ARTIST NAME] is submitting [TRACK NAME], a [INSTRUMENTATION]-led song written and produced by [ARTIST/PRODUCER]. The track's narrative centres on [THEMATIC FOCUS], delivered through [VOCAL APPROACH/LYRICAL STYLE]. Musically, it builds from [INTRO ARRANGEMENT] into [MAIN ARRANGEMENT], emphasising [EMOTIONAL ARC]. This fits [PLAYLIST/CURATOR NAME] because your focus on [CURATOR'S STATED EDITORIAL DIRECTION] aligns with our work's [HOW]. Recorded [LOCATION/TIMEFRAME], this track has resonated with [SPECIFIC LISTENER DEMOGRAPHIC/LIVE RESPONSE]. We're planning [RELEASE STRATEGY/TOUR/COLLABORATION], making this a strategic moment for discovery playlist placement. Full track, lyrics, and artist background available.

Acoustic curators value authenticity and narrative — commercial ambition reads as insincerity here. Describe your recording honestly (bedroom, studio, live session). Lyrical content matters; don't hide it. If you're brand new, focus on the song's emotional truth rather than credentials.

[ARTIST NAME] — [TRACK NAME]. This submission doesn't fit one category neatly: it combines [GENRE A] rhythms with [GENRE B] textures and [GENRE C] instrumentation. The result is [HONEST DESCRIPTION OF WHAT IT SOUNDS LIKE]. The track evolved from [PRODUCTION CONTEXT], and it's designed for listeners who appreciate [SPECIFIC LISTENER PROFILE: experimental electronic and hip-hop crossover/post-genre discovery etc.]. We're positioning this toward [SPECIFIC PLAYLIST NICHE] because [SPECIFIC REASON]. Your recent curation of [SPECIFIC TRACK/ARTIST] suggests you value [WHAT THEY WERE EXPERIMENTING WITH] — this follows a similar path. We're transparent: this track challenges format. But that's intentional. Full context, stems, and background available on request.

Genre-blending needs clarity, not mystery. Tell curators exactly what they're hearing, even if it's unusual. Identify which curator types will actually appreciate experimentation — many won't, and that's okay. Be honest about the track's commercial ceiling.

[ARTIST NAME] presents [TRACK NAME], a [TEMPO/MOOD] R&B track anchored by [VOCAL CHARACTERISTIC/PERFORMANCE NOTE]. The production, overseen by [PRODUCER NAME], draws on [PRODUCTION INSPIRATION], with [SONIC DETAIL: lush strings, minimalist beat, live instrumentation]. Lyrically, the track explores [SUBJECT MATTER], and vocally [ARTIST NAME] delivers [SPECIFIC PERFORMANCE CHOICE]. This suits [PLAYLIST NAME] because you've recently featured [SIMILAR ARTIST], and this track shares that [SHARED QUALITY]. Recording took place [STUDIO/LOCATION], with mixing by [MIXER NAME]. We're releasing [FORMAT/STRATEGY], and we believe this sits perfectly in your [SPECIFIC CURATOR FOCUS]. Artist bio, high-res imagery, and additional material available.

Soul and R&B curators care about vocal authenticity and production taste — both must feel intentional, not chased. Be specific about production choices and influences; vague 'soulful' language suggests you haven't considered your own sound critically. Name the producer if they're credible.

[ARTIST NAME] is submitting [TRACK NAME], a [PRODUCTION STYLE] pop track with mass appeal and streaming viability. The track features [HOOK/DISTINCTIVE ELEMENT], delivered over production by [PRODUCER NAME]. It's positioned for [SPECIFIC PLAYLIST TYPE: New Music Daily, algorithmic discovery, radio adds]. The hook lands at [SONG TIMESTAMP], and the track's structure follows [PRODUCTION APPROACH] that encourages repeat listening and playlist inclusion. We're confident this fits [SPECIFIC CURATOR/PLAYLIST] because [CONCRETE REASON: your recent additions show appetite for X-style production]. Supporting data: [IF RELEVANT: previous track performance, playlist momentum, artist growth]. This drops [RELEASE DATE], so timing aligns with discovery window. Full promotional pack, audio, and metrics available.

Pop curators are results-focused — they care about streaming performance indicators, hook strength, and playlist momentum. Don't hide release dates or delay details. If you're new or the track is underperforming, avoid this template. Use data, not enthusiasm.

[ENSEMBLE/ARTIST NAME] is submitting [COMPOSITION NAME], recorded [RECORDING CONTEXT]. This piece features [INSTRUMENTATION] in [TIME SIGNATURE/COMPOSITIONAL APPROACH], composed by [COMPOSER]. The track showcases [SPECIFIC MUSICAL CHARACTERISTIC: interplay between saxophone and strings, minimalist development, baroque-influenced harmony]. It's performed by [ENSEMBLE MEMBER CREDITS], recorded at [VENUE/STUDIO], engineered by [ENGINEER]. This suits [PLAYLIST/CURATOR NAME] because your recent focus on [SPECIFIC STYLE/ERA/APPROACH] aligns with our compositional direction. The piece builds on [MUSICAL LINEAGE/TRADITION] whilst [WHAT MAKES IT CONTEMPORARY]. We're [SERIES/RELEASE CONTEXT], making discovery placement timely. Full score, recording notes, and artist credentials available.

Classical and jazz curators prioritise musicianship credits, recording quality, and compositional clarity. Producer names matter less than ensemble names and instrument quality. Avoid language that positions serious music as 'accessible' — it's insulting. Be precise about form, harmony, and what listeners will actually hear.