Skip to main content
Templates

Case studies for PR proposals Templates

Case studies for PR proposals

Case studies are how you prove you can deliver outcomes, not just activity. A strong case study shows the specific challenge you solved, the strategy you used, and the measurable results you achieved. These templates focus on the narrative structure and results formatting that make prospective clients believe you can replicate that success for them.

8 templates

The Problem-Strategy-Results Structure

When you need a clear, linear case study that works across multiple formats — proposals, your website, and pitch decks

[Artist/Label Name] faced [specific problem: low streaming numbers, limited playlist reach, regional visibility only]. Their previous approach of [what wasn't working] had plateaued after [timeframe]. We developed a campaign centred on [core strategy: targeted playlist pitching, DSP relationships, media partnerships] combined with [specific creative angle or narrative hook]. Over [campaign length], we secured [quantified results: playlist adds across specific playlists, streaming growth percentage, playlist placements]. This led to [secondary outcome: touring opportunities, brand partnerships, investor interest]. The campaign demonstrated that [key insight about their audience or the market] was critical to breakthrough.

Customise the timeframe to match realistic campaign lengths in your sector. Use specific playlist names and tier levels rather than vague references. Include at least one figure the prospect can benchmark their own goals against.

The Threshold-to-Scale Model

When demonstrating how you took an artist from emerging to commercially viable, or accelerated momentum at a critical inflection point

When [Artist Name] partnered with us, they had [baseline metric: X monthly listeners, Y playlist placements, Z press mentions]. Our focus was identifying the threshold at which their growth would compound—the point where added visibility would drive organic momentum. We concentrated on [specific activities: DSP relationships with key curators, targeted journalist outreach, strategic playlist positioning] rather than spreading effort across ineffective channels. Within [timeframe], monthly listeners grew to [figure], and crucially, the rate of growth accelerated. By month [X], organic playlist adds represented [percentage] of total placements, proving the foundation was self-sustaining. This allowed them to transition from independent promotion to label-backed distribution without losing momentum.

This structure works well for artists who grew significantly. Highlight the moment they tipped from needing heavy promotion to self-sustaining growth. Use monthly listener graphs or playlist velocity data if visually presenting this.

The Lateral Opportunity Case Study

When your best result wasn't more streams or bigger press, but unlocking a different revenue or visibility stream entirely

[Artist] came to us seeking increased streaming visibility. During research, we identified that [insight: their fanbase was highly engaged on TikTok, their music suited sync opportunities, they had a collaborator relationship that was underutilised]. Rather than compete in the traditional playlist-and-press arena, we pivoted to [different strategy: sync licensing strategy, creator partnership model, feature-led campaign]. This resulted in [specific outcome: X sync placements generating £Y revenue, Z brand partnerships, or ABC creator uses totalling XYZ views]. This generated [secondary benefits: ongoing licensing revenue, creator network that continues to promote, brand relationships leading to further opportunities]. Crucially, the streaming numbers [maintained/grew/evolved] without being the campaign's focus.

Use this when an alternative strategy outperformed the expected one. It's powerful because it shows strategic thinking beyond the obvious ask. Include partnership names or brand categories if the client can be named.

The Crisis-to-Catalyst Structure

When you've successfully navigated a difficult campaign period—rebrand, controversial situation, comeback—and turned it into opportunity

[Artist] faced [specific challenge: release date shift, negative media attention, competitive oversaturation in their genre]. The initial response was [their or others' reaction]. Rather than [standard reaction], we recognised that [strategic opportunity: the attention could be redirected, the delay could reposition the release, the genre saturation created niche positioning opportunity]. Our campaign emphasised [specific narrative angle or repositioning]. Over [timeframe], this resulted in [outcome: stronger first-week performance than originally projected, media narrative shift, audience expansion into new demographic]. The experience proved that [insight about recovery, narrative flexibility, or market positioning].

Only use this if you can frame the outcome positively without appearing opportunistic about difficulties. Focus on your strategic response rather than dwelling on the problem. Use specific timeline markers to show momentum building.

The Multi-Territory Expansion Model

When showing how you scaled a campaign from one territory to multiple markets, or grew an artist's international reach

[Artist] had achieved success in [initial territory/territories]. To expand beyond this base, we conducted analysis of [what determined their appeal: production style, lyrical themes, audience demographics in growth markets]. We partnered with [specific territory teams/curators/press contacts], adapting [part of campaign] for [different market characteristics] while maintaining [core brand identity]. In [initial territory], the campaign achieved [result]. When expanded to [new territory 1], we realised [X outcome, learning, or acceleration]. Territory 2 required [different approach] and delivered [Y result]. Within [total timeframe], the artist grew from [baseline] to [expanded figure] monthly listeners, with representation in [X territories]. This demonstrated that [insight about platform targeting, cultural adaptation, or international fan development].

Specify which territories and what made them different—this shows sophisticated thinking. Include one metric that shows the efficiency of international expansion versus domestic-only growth.

The Long-Term Positioning Case Study

When your value isn't a single campaign spike but sustained positioning or recurring opportunities over 12+ months

[Artist/Label] engaged us for ongoing playlist and media positioning across [timeframe: 12-24 months]. Rather than a launch-focused campaign, we built [specific infrastructure: quarterly DSP touchpoints, consistent journalist briefings, strategic collaboration pipeline]. Results compounded over time: Month 1-3 delivered [baseline result], months 4-8 showed [acceleration through new foundation], months 9-12 demonstrated [self-sustaining growth or new opportunity emergence]. Over the full period, they accumulated [total metric: X playlist placements, Y press mentions, Z monetisable outcomes]. Critically, [specific benefit: they retained key playlist positions even during release gaps, developed relationships with curators who continued to support future work, or built audience in a new demographic]. The partnership value isn't captured in any single month but in the compounding effect of strategic consistency.

This works well for retainer or ongoing relationships. Use a timeline graphic if presenting visually. Include at least one metric showing sustained momentum rather than single-spike success.

The Genre-Specific or Format Innovation Case Study

When demonstrating expertise in a specific genre, format, or emerging platform strategy

[Artist] creates [specific genre/format], which faces unique playlist and listener challenges: [specific barrier, e.g., genre gatekeeping, niche audience discovery, format limitations]. We leveraged [specific platform strength or emerging strategy: Spotify's algorithmic playlist mechanics for genre, TikTok's audio discovery, YouTube's long-form video ecosystem, or subgenre community platforms]. Our approach focused on [concrete tactic: building in specific playlists known to feed algorithmic recommendations, creating short-form content for specific creator communities, positioning within subgenre communities]. Within [timeframe], results included [metric specific to format: X algorithmic playlist adds, Y creator uses, Z long-tail playlist positions]. This led to [sustainable outcome: recurring algorithmic playlist placement, sustained community engagement, or predictable growth model]. The campaign proved that [insight about platform mechanics or audience behaviour in this space].

Use this if you have specialist knowledge of a genre or platform. Name specific playlists or communities only if you're confident they still exist and are relevant. Include at least one metric showing how format-specific thinking outperformed generic strategies.

The Measurement-Forward Case Study

When the decision-makers at your prospect organisation care most about attribution, ROI tracking, and proving where results came from

[Artist] partnered with us with clear attribution requirements: we needed to isolate which activities drove which results. We implemented [specific tracking infrastructure: UTM parameters across all channels, attribution modelling, separate release strategies across markets or campaigns]. During [campaign period], we tracked: [Activity 1] generated [X result, with Y attribution confidence]. [Activity 2] contributed [X result]. [Activity 3] generated [X result but also enabled Activity 2, showing multiplier effect]. Total campaign cost was £[figure], delivering [overall result with calculated ROI or cost-per-outcome]. Crucially, the data revealed that [unexpected insight: a low-cost activity had outsized impact, a high-cost activity was less effective than assumed, or a specific combination of activities created synergy]. This became the foundation for [future campaign scaling, budget optimisation, or strategic pivoting].

Only use this template if you genuinely have solid attribution data. Label any assumptions clearly (e.g., 'estimated attribution'). Focus on one surprising insight from the data; this is more credible than claiming every tactic was equally valuable.

Frequently asked questions

Should I include artists I can't name in case studies, or should I wait until I have releasable examples?

Include anonymised case studies if they demonstrate significant outcomes—prospect clients care more about what you achieved than whose name is attached. Use anonymised examples sparingly (one per proposal maximum) and only if the results are exceptional enough to justify the reduced credibility. As your named case studies grow, phase out anonymised versions.

How do I write a case study for an artist who didn't meet my original success targets but had a meaningful outcome?

Reframe around what you actually achieved and what it led to—a smaller streaming growth that created touring opportunity, modest playlist traction that opened sync relationships, or failed traditional campaign that pivoted to successful alternative strategy. The narrative matters more than whether you hit the initial metric; show strategic thinking over inflated claims.

What metrics matter most in a case study—streams, playlist adds, press mentions, or something else?

Lead with the metric that best demonstrates outcome for the specific prospect's goal. For DSP-focused clients, emphasise streaming and playlist velocity; for brand/sync-focused prospects, highlight partnerships or licensing placements; for touring artists, show ticket sales or touring opportunities. Always include at least one financial or business outcome—revenue, cost-per-outcome, or secondary opportunity value.

How recent should case studies be to feel relevant?

Case studies from the last 18 months carry more weight because platform algorithms and audience behaviours shift. If your most impressive work is older, include a brief note about what's changed in the landscape and how you've adapted your approach since. A case study from 2-3 years ago with exceptional results is better than a recent mediocre one.

Should I include competitor artists or artists on competing labels in case studies?

Avoid case studies featuring direct competitors of your prospect or their key touring rivals—it raises discomfort even if you handled both brilliantly. If you must reference a competitive artist, frame it in terms of market positioning or audience expansion into different territories, not as your primary outcome example.

Related resources

Run your music PR campaigns in TAP

The professional platform for UK music PR agencies. Contact intelligence, pitch drafting, and campaign tracking — without the spreadsheets.