TAP
/
Resources
/
BBC Radio 3 PR
/
Getting an Album on BBC Radio 3 Record Review

Checklist

Getting an Album on BBC Radio 3 Record Review

Radio 3 Record Review and album campaign

Updated 3 October 2026

By TAP Editorial Team

Quick answer

Record Review is Radio 3's Saturday morning classical programme, and it is the main route to having an album discussed on the station. New releases are reviewed by critics who compare them with existing recordings, and Building a Library surveys every available recording of a single work before recommending one. Send a physical copy and a private link to the programme's producer at least eight weeks before release.

Record Review is Radio 3's Saturday morning classical programme, and it is where albums get discussed at length rather than played in passing. Two things happen on it: new recordings are reviewed by critics who set them against what already exists, and Building a Library takes a single work, surveys every recording of it available, and recommends one. Both run on long lead times, both are editorially independent, and neither responds to a release campaign. What they respond to is a recording that adds something to a catalogue they know extremely well. This checklist covers the timing, the materials and the follow-through.

0 of 35 completed0%

Timing

Send eight to ten weeks before release
Critical
Longer than any other radio pitch you will make. A critic reviewing your record needs time to hear it properly and to pull the recordings they are going to compare it with, and the programme has to find the week to put it in. Six weeks is the point below which it stops being realistic.
Check what the station is already committed to
The Proms run from July to September and Radio 3 broadcasts every one of them, and there are festival seasons either side. That does not close the door, but it does mean album coverage competes with a fixed schedule. A quieter month gives the same record more room.
Know which part of the programme you are aiming at
Critical
A new release review and a Building a Library survey are different things with different timescales. A review is about your recording. A survey is about a work, and yours is one of the recordings in it, which means it can happen long after release rather than around it.
If your album is core repertoire, say so plainly
A new recording of a work that already has forty versions has a low bar to clear for attention and a high one to clear for praise. That is the trade. Being specific about which edition, which tempo relationships or which performing decisions you have taken is what makes a comparison interesting rather than routine.
Read the schedule rather than a guide
Radio 3 publishes programme information week by week, and it changes. Checking what has actually been reviewed in the last two months tells you more about what is likely to be covered than any general advice, this page included.
Do not build the release plan around a review you have not been offered
Critical
The programme decides what it covers, and most records are not covered. Plan the release as though nothing is coming, then treat a review as something that arrived rather than something that was late.

What to send

Send a physical copy where you can
Critical
Classical reviewing still runs on physical media, partly because a booklet carries the information a reviewer needs. Mark the package clearly with the artist, the work, the release date and the programme you are sending it for.
Include a private streaming link as well
Critical
Lossless files on a link that plays in a browser, so a reviewer can hear it the day it arrives rather than the day the post gets opened. Keep the link live well past your release date.
Write one page of context, no more
Critical
What the work is, who is playing, where and when it was recorded, which edition or arrangement, and anything unusual about the performing decisions. A reviewer knows the repertoire better than you do. What they do not know is what you chose to do and why.
Give a full track listing with timings and credits
Exact durations, movement titles, composer dates, performer names spelled correctly. Reviewers cue specific moments on air, and a wrong timing is the difference between a clip that works and one that does not get used.
Say whether the performers are available to talk
One line, at the end. If the recording is the first of a rediscovered work, or the performer has a particular history with it, that is worth a sentence. If not, leave it out rather than manufacturing a reason.
Leave the photographs and the artwork out
Radio does not need them at this stage and they make the package look like promotion. Send them if and when someone asks.

Getting it to the right person

Take the producer credit from a recent episode
Critical
Programme credits are read at the end and listed on the programme page. That is the name to write to. Anything addressed to the station rather than to a programme has nobody responsible for it.
Write to one programme at a time
Critical
The same package sent to four Radio 3 programmes at once is visible from the inside, because the people receiving it sit near each other. Pick the programme the record belongs on and send it there.
Keep the covering email to five sentences
What the record is, who is on it, when it is out, what is unusual about it, and what you have sent. The one page of context does the rest. Long emails to producers get read last.
Follow up once, two weeks later
A single note confirming the package arrived is reasonable and often useful, because post goes astray. After that, silence is the answer. Repeated chasing costs you the next record as well as this one.
Say thank you if it is reviewed, even if the review is unkind
Coverage on this programme means an expert listened closely and formed a view. Acknowledging it, briefly and without arguing, is how the next package gets opened.
Stay in touch between records, sparingly
A short note when something real happens, an award, a first performance, a recording of something rarely done, keeps you a known name. Once or twice a year, not monthly.

How to describe the record

Write about the music, not the release
Critical
Not that it is out on the fourteenth with a campaign behind it. What is on it, why this repertoire, what was decided in the sessions. Read your own page back and cut every sentence that would be identical for a different album.
Lead with anything that is a first
Critical
A first recording, a restored score, a work unavailable for decades, an instrument or pitch standard rarely used. These are the things that make a record worth discussing rather than filing, and they should be in the first line.
Name the recordings yours will be compared with
A reviewer is going to put your version next to two or three others whether you mention them or not. Naming them yourself shows you know the field and frames the comparison on your terms, provided your record can stand it.
Mention any BBC performance history
If the performers have played for a BBC orchestra, at the Proms or in a Radio 3 broadcast, say so in a clause. It is a fact about the players rather than a claim about the record, which is why it carries.
Drop the release-campaign vocabulary
Critical
Phrases like out now, eagerly awaited and available everywhere are the wrong register here and mark the sender out immediately. Write it as you would write a programme note.
Credit the label, venue and funders
An independent label with a catalogue, a hall with a known acoustic, a trust that funded the sessions. Each tells a reviewer something about how the record was made, which is part of what they are assessing.

After a broadcast

Wait for the date in writing before you announce anything
Critical
Schedules move. Announcing a review that then slips leaves you correcting yourself in public, and the people who would have to reschedule it are the same people you want to send your next record to.
Save the episode while it is still available
Critical
Programmes stay on BBC Sounds for a limited window, so check the availability shown on the page and note the date it expires. Keep the link and the broadcast date somewhere you will find them in a year.
Send the review on to writers and other stations
Two lines: the record was reviewed on Record Review on this date, here is the link. It gives a magazine editor or another producer a reason to take a second look at something they had passed over.
Tell your own audience a few days ahead
Mailing list and social, with the date, the time and how to listen afterwards. The people who already care about your work are the ones most likely to actually tune in, and their listening is what the station notices.
Ask before quoting a reviewer
Broadcast words are not automatically yours to print. A short, polite request to the programme is usually all it takes, and asking is the difference between a quotable line and an awkward email.
Keep the record working for months, not days
Classical releases build slowly, and a review can bring listeners to a record long after the week it aired. Keep the link live, keep it on your artist page, and mention it in the next pitch.

When it does not happen

Accept it and do not send the record again
Critical
Far more albums arrive than can ever be covered. Resending the same recording, or asking why it was passed over, is the clearest way to be remembered as someone whose next package can wait.
Give it longer than you think before assuming
A record can sit in a queue for months before a suitable week arrives, and a Building a Library survey may not come round to your work for a year. No news is not the same as no.
Expect an honest verdict rather than support
Critical
These are critics, not champions, and a mixed review from someone who knows the repertoire is a real result. Never write to dispute an opinion. It ends the relationship and changes nothing.
Work the rest of the station and beyond it
Radio 3 has other programmes, and there are specialist stations, magazines and podcasts covering the same repertoire with more room for a new name. A record turned down in one place has not been turned down everywhere.
Clear the rights before you pitch, not after
Critical
Broadcast needs clearances. If a work, an edition or a sample is not cleared for broadcast, a producer who wants to play it will find out at the worst moment and simply drop it. Sort it out while the record is still being made.

Record Review carries weight because it is independent and because the people on it know the repertoire cold. That is also why there is no shortcut into it. What you can control is sending early, sending a recording worth comparing, describing it the way a musician would, and then leaving it alone.

Pro tips

1. Send eight to ten weeks ahead, physical copy plus a private link, marked clearly with the programme you are sending it for. Under six weeks, a reviewer has no time to pull the comparison recordings, which is most of the work.

2. Build a Library surveys are about a work rather than a release, so a recording of standard repertoire can be discussed a year after it comes out. Keep the link live and the copy in circulation long past release week.

3. One page of context, written as a programme note. Which edition, which players, where it was recorded, what you decided to do differently. Everything a reviewer could look up themselves is wasted space.

4. Take the producer name from the end of a recent episode and write to that person about that programme. A package addressed to the station belongs to nobody.

5. Wait for a confirmed date in writing before telling anyone. Schedules move, and announcing a review that slips is a self-inflicted correction in front of the people you most want to impress.

Frequently asked questions

How far ahead should I send an album to Record Review?

Eight to ten weeks before release. A reviewer has to hear your recording and gather the versions they will set it against, and the programme has to find a week for it. Under six weeks the practical answer is usually no, whatever the record is like.

Do I need to send a physical copy?

Send one if you have one, and include a private link as well. Classical reviewing still runs on physical media, partly because the booklet carries the information a reviewer wants: performers, editions, recording dates and venue. The link means somebody can hear it the day it arrives rather than waiting on the post.

What is the difference between a review and Building a Library?

A review discusses your recording as a new release. Building a Library takes one work, surveys the recordings of it that are available, and recommends one. The second is not tied to your release date at all, which means a recording of standard repertoire can be picked up long after it came out, so keep it available.

Should I follow up if I hear nothing?

Once, about two weeks later, to confirm the package arrived. Post does go missing and that note is useful. After that, treat silence as the answer, because the programme covers a small fraction of what it receives and chasing does not change the arithmetic.

Can I announce a review before it airs?

Only once you have the date in writing, and even then keep it low key. Schedules change, and a public announcement you have to walk back costs you more than the coverage was worth. Tell your mailing list a few days ahead and leave it there.

Related resources

Radio 3 New Music and contemporary commissions: A Practical Guide

guide

Radio 3 pitch email Templates

template library

BBC Radio 3 programming structure and shows: A Practical Guide